«
»

McCain: protecting women’s health is extreme


Last presidential debate 10/15/2008 – John McCain’s most appalling moment about choice yet – he actually mocks protecting women’s health by putting “health” in

, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

This entry was posted on April 24, 2009, 11:48 am and is filed under Wellness. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

  1. #1 by jonayork on November 7, 2008 - 1:27 am

    Soundin’ kinda’ preechy here and all righteous too, wow!

    Down boy.

    What is more powerful than a Godly Mother?

  2. #2 by jonayork on November 7, 2008 - 1:29 am

    Are you hitting on me?

    Dream on; just say no to deviant sex.

  3. #3 by BunnaySango on November 7, 2008 - 8:20 pm

    LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  4. #4 by jonayork on November 8, 2008 - 6:57 pm

    I’m not advocating death as you; but the defense of life!!! ALL LIFE.

    But you are willfully blind.

  5. #5 by mininairs on November 9, 2008 - 12:35 am

    well we have news for you. all are not christians living in this country. So if your relgion tells you to do or not to do something then follow it. dont thrust it on others. get it.

  6. #6 by mininairs on November 9, 2008 - 12:39 am

    what about americans bombing other countries and killing pregnant mothers and children

  7. #7 by mininairs on November 9, 2008 - 12:41 am

    so i guess jonayork is against capital punishment. no eye for an eye bullshit. not to go around bombing others and killing other citizens huh.

  8. #8 by jonayork on November 9, 2008 - 12:51 am

    PROTECT LIFE
    That means to PROTECT LIFE.

    A bomber, a convicted murder, a rapist, anyone deserving of capitol punishment receiving justice is the protection of life!

  9. #9 by jonayork on November 9, 2008 - 1:00 am

    What an inane question. No mothers,pregnant or otherwise in other countries are targets.

    Only in America by abortionists; where they need no bombs. Mostly children are killed but sometimes the mother too. The would-be Mother is almost always left mentally and emotionally damaged.

  10. #10 by jonayork on November 9, 2008 - 4:45 am

    There are those who want legalized prostitution, and to legalize all drugs.

    There is no longer a stigma attached to having children out of wedlock. STDs are a far worse consequence.

    There are severe penalties and attached wages for divorced husband/fathers or head of household as deterrent to divorce.

    Why are you afraid of protecting life?

  11. #11 by jonayork on November 9, 2008 - 4:52 am

    Tumors and arms will never become a baby.

    Once human life is generated it needs constitutional protection.

    Protect all life please!

  12. #12 by 1videoaday on December 3, 2008 - 7:25 am

    protect life! don’t kill it.

  13. #13 by pimplup818 on February 3, 2009 - 3:07 am

    NEVER

  14. #14 by pimplup818 on February 3, 2009 - 3:13 am

    what defines “alternate lifestyles”?

  15. #15 by jonayork on February 3, 2009 - 3:32 am

    Our world operates with order, purpose and design. “Alternate” is a nice way of saying “deviant.” Or against the design.

    There is a law God placed in the natural universe; so that whether one believes in God or not, the law remains,

    “Live righteously or die.” That’s it!

    It’s vital that we live right lives for ourselves and the innocent around us.

    Don’t you agree?

  16. #16 by pimplup818 on February 3, 2009 - 12:08 pm

    I was wondering what those alternate/ deviant lifestyles were implying
    If one doesn’t believe in god, they won’t believe the law exists (ie:agnostic here)
    and it depends what you mean by right lives

  17. #17 by jonayork on February 3, 2009 - 12:25 pm

    Oh …but they do believe the law exists. They appeal to it on a regular basis.

    Don’t you your self know when someone has wronged you? Jesus said,”Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets. (Matthew 7:12)

    Please find your Bible and just start reading. Start with the Gospel of John; you’ll be amazed Dear Heart.

  18. #18 by pimplup818 on February 3, 2009 - 12:35 pm

    umm.. yes, but that’s a law of humanity, you can’t prove it’s a law of god, or if jesus really said that in the first place. If you want to believe it, that’s fine and it’s your decision. But please don’t go around acting like it’s fact.

  19. #19 by jonayork on February 4, 2009 - 1:14 am

    Of course it’s fact!

    Wait just a minute …law of humanity? Don’t you mean conscience? Con/science means with/knowledge; mankind was a special creation of God; His crowning jewel. He created us with a conscience and with a free will!

    You are free to dis-believe! This is what makes America great in world governments.

    I suppose you will have to learn this the hard way.

    Too bad sweety. Just remember Jesus’ offer is rof a limited time only.

  20. #20 by lindseylarae on February 4, 2009 - 6:19 am

    So you get to choose if a person lives or dies as long as you decide that they are “deserving”, but a pregnant woman cannot decide whether or not she should have a child? That sounds a bit paradoxical…

    Note: Rapists do not get the death penalty unless they killed their victim as well…just an FYI.

  21. #21 by jonayork on February 5, 2009 - 1:46 am

    The decision is made by the convicted to forfeit their life for whatever crime justifies death.
    The government is mandated to a speedy and impartial trial and to execute justice. The value on taking a life is really high in this scenario …but…

    YOU on the other hand kill for the happiness of the would-be Mother. Life becomes exceedingly cheap.

  22. #22 by SpammerNation on February 16, 2009 - 10:24 pm

    ya, john mccain is the anti-crist, ya fucking right, you probably dont even know what the anti- crist is, ya i bet obama care about all of those millions of lifes lost every year due to abortion

    look fucker i said it wrong, i never said it would change, even though it, gives some one, a person a change to live

    so burn in hell bitch!!!

  23. #23 by SpammerNation on February 16, 2009 - 10:24 pm

    fuck you

  24. #24 by infinitecharms on February 16, 2009 - 11:24 pm

    Maybe you should have been aborted and this world would be a better place. I don’t even understand what the hell you are talking about with your crappy writing and don’t call me a bitch you illiterate piece of shit.

  25. #25 by agentbong138 on March 26, 2009 - 4:44 am

    I believe what he is saying is that Obama is talking about Abortions being done for the “health” of the mother… you people take things so far out of context.

Comments are closed.